(24) 5. He should further have directed them that if
(5)
or joj, or c), Ke
found. against either as, or joy,
transactions
statement im
that
ikey
not for cash,
cast, and the твой
The Report was
tren find
loc; and
mus
Knew
kat the
statement
d.) whether Brewer
ww
to
in for.
julss.
40
and dy,
the findings; the Jury ought to find of jacts as, and so), and (c)i there is evidence that these facts did
because
n
exish, and there is
no evidence proving bey und don't that they did not exist.
reasonabolz don't
1617. Regarding
the
aridence..
As to (a) it is admitted. it at Promiso ry
da
16
၁၂
excented, and their is
مرد اس راز
no evidence of pictò
impairing their legat sucidity,
it is a domitted that the
off against ach other, toto (e) there is wri'dence
constientia
Interest was
Some of the
Jemando
wire
vel
that the Promissory
nuine pusin ess
18otio
11.26
Business iransuctions:-
actited agumist the oromisfijoro : p.
were paid wp: p. 11. 19. 23. 22.
wuns
some cases judgment was had efunct the promisor:
In
In
one
case the spicine Receiver oned in
1.26.56 a Nore: p. 26. 57.
The promisurs were man of unpliance for
of
minces: p.rr. 20.03
quaranteed my men of sur
quenter or leas degree, in jurous
He refunded voluntarily p55, 000 to the Company. p. 71.
It is also, to a
of. Brewer's
10 úna
fides Bat:
He received
inly
^
smiale salary.
171
neld
Ꮧ
со
un y
compurauncle sman
of inarcs (200) ni ite
compan
35.
P
rom the Comping yo. 98.
A unhes
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.